US Inventor Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case Akeva v. Nike

US INVENTOR FILES AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPREME COURT CASE AKEVA V. NIKE In their Amicus Brief, US Inventor highlights an inconsistency in patent law in regards to claim construction methodology. Whether Federal Circuit judges will use a claim-centered or holistic approach to claim construction is uncertain. The question presented in

US Inventor Files Amicus Brief Highlighting the Appointments Clause Violation in the PTAB

US INVENTOR FILES AMICUS BRIEF HIGHLIGHTING THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE VIOLATION IN THE PTAB The administrative patent "judges" (APJs) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are given the privileges and authority of principal officers without being appointed by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent, as the Appointments Clause

PTAB Follow Up Letter

PTAB FOLLOW UP LETTER PPAC letter from US Inventor Read the official PPAC letter   November 11, 2019   Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC)   Marylee Jenkins, Chair; Steven Caltrider, Jennifer A. Camacho, Barney Cassidy, Mark E. Goodson, Bernard J. Knight, Jr., Dan H. Lang, Jeffrey M. Sears, Julie Mar-Spinola, Members; Pamela

SUCCESS Act Letter

SUCCESS ACT LETTER SUCCESS Act Letter from US Inventor president Randy Landreneau to the Patent Public Advisory Committee regarding a serious omission Link to the official letter November 11, 2019 Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC) Marylee Jenkins, Chair; Steven Caltrider, Jennifer A. Camacho, Barney Cassidy, Mark E. Goodson, Bernard J. Knight, Jr.,

Appointments Clause Letter

Appointments Clause Letter from US Inventor President Randy Landreneau Link to the official letter November 11, 2019 Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC) Marylee Jenkins, Chair; Steven Caltrider, Jennifer A. Camacho, Barney Cassidy, Mark E. Goodson, Bernard J. Knight, Jr., Dan H. Lang, Jeffrey M. Sears, Julie Mar-Spinola, Members; Pamela R. Schwartz, Catherine Faint, Vernon Ako

Go to Top